Same prompts. Different outputs.
Same $20/month.
Six real tasks you probably ran this week. What a generic LLM gives you. What Maxim gives you. Decide for yourself which one ships.
You get a polished email. You have no idea if it applies any persuasion framework. You edit for brand voice by hand.
You get a polished email composed with Fogg B=MAP, Maxim's Prospect-Theory CTA, and your brand voice already loaded. Confidence tag + gaps flagged.
You get a general review. GDPR and PIPEDA may or may not come up. You chase the regulator for clarification.
Claude routes to CSO · security-analyst. 14 compliance frameworks load automatically. Every clause is tagged against the relevant regulation with cited section numbers.
Context window is empty. You re-paste your README, your sprint notes, your architecture doc. You re-explain who the customer is.
Session-continuity loads your project's decisions, open handoffs, and moat claims on start. Ten drift checks run automatically. You continue, not restart.
You find out in review. Or worse, in production. You rewrite the spec.
Proactive Watch catches the reference against your dependency manifest before the spec leaves the session. Drift class: orphan-refs. Severity: 4.
There's no rubric. You trust it or you don't.
Every output ends with Basis · Gap · Mitigation · Next. You know what grounds the answer, what's missing, how to close the gap, what would change the tag. Trust becomes mechanical.
Everyone has their own prompt library. Brand voice is a Google Doc nobody opens.
Three-layer voice system loads Maxim base, operator overlay, and startup overlay on every session. Your team's outputs sound like one team, not five freelancers.
Install free.
Upgrade when the moat shows up in your work.
90-day Pro Trial auto-activates on install. Keep using Starter after, or commit to Solo at $19.99.